The scoreboard, and what is not on it. The hard targets, how often each is actually
looked at, and the quiet signals that never reach a dashboard.
AI Legal Review Turnaround Time
The average time it takes you to complete a legal review for a new AI feature or system once all necessary information is provided.
Target · Under 48 hours for standard reviews; under 5 working days for complex cases. You complete 8 out of 10 standard AI feature reviews within 36 hours, and your two complex reviews are done within 4 working days, hitting your targets.
Accuracy of Risk Identification
How accurately you identify and document potential legal and compliance risks in AI systems, as validated by senior counsel.
Target · > 95% accuracy on critical risks; > 90% overall. In a review of a new generative AI tool, you flag 10 potential IP and data privacy risks. Senior counsel agrees with 9 of them, and the 10th is a minor point, showing high accuracy.
Number of AI-Related Legal Memos/Assessments
The volume of legal research memos, impact assessments (like DPIAs for AI), or policy drafts you independently produce.
Target · Roughly 5-7 significant pieces per quarter. You draft a comprehensive memo on 'Hallucinations & Liability' for a new LLM, complete two Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI models, and review three AI-powered vendor contracts in a quarter.
Adherence to AI Governance Frameworks
How consistently you apply our internal AI governance processes, templates, and checklists during your reviews.
Target · 100% adherence to mandatory steps; > 90% for recommended best practices. Every AI feature review you conduct includes a completed AI Risk Assessment template, a documented data provenance check, and a record of stakeholder sign-offs, as required by our framework.
Quality of Advice & Practicality
The clarity, completeness, and practical applicability of your legal advice to technical and product teams.
- Product managers and engineers consistently report that your advice is easy to understand and actionable. They'll come back to you with follow-up questions, showing they trust your guidance. You'll hear phrases like 'that really helped us figure out the next steps' in feedback sessions.
Proactive Issue Spotting
Your ability to anticipate legal challenges related to AI before they become urgent problems, often flagging issues others haven't considered.
- You're often bringing up potential risks in early-stage product discussions that weren't on anyone else's radar. Senior counsel will note your foresight in reviews, and you'll prevent issues that would have otherwise caused delays or rework.
Collaboration with Technical Teams
How effectively you work with data scientists, engineers, and product managers, building trust and helping them understand legal constraints.
- Technical teams actively seek your input early in their development cycles, rather than seeing legal as a last-minute hurdle. You'll get positive feedback from them about your ability to explain complex legal concepts in their language. They'll feel you're a partner, not just a gatekeeper.
Contribution to Knowledge Sharing
Your efforts to help build out our internal knowledge base for AI legal matters, including documenting findings and best practices.
- You consistently update our Confluence pages with clear summaries of new regulations or common AI legal questions. You might even informally guide new joiners, sharing your insights without being asked. Your contributions make it easier for others to find answers.