The scoreboard, and what is not on it. The hard targets, how often each is actually
looked at, and the quiet signals that never reach a dashboard.
Rule Precision
The percentage of times your detection rules correctly identify bad behaviour versus flagging legitimate users or content.
Target · >99.95% on rules shipped If your new spam rule flags 10,000 items, and only 5 of those were legitimate user posts, that's a 99.95% precision rate. Anything lower, and we'll be having a chat about user impact.
False Negative Rate for Owned Abuse Areas
How much bad stuff (e.g., specific type of spam, account takeover attempts) you miss that later gets identified by other means or human review.
Target · Reduce by 10% quarter-over-quarter for your assigned abuse type. You're responsible for comment spam. If in Q1, 100 spam comments slipped past your systems, we'd expect that number to be 90 or less in Q2 thanks to your improvements.
Time to Resolution for Investigation Tickets
How quickly you can investigate and resolve tickets escalated from the Trust & Safety Operations team regarding potential system bypasses or new abuse patterns.
Target · Close 80% of investigation tickets within 48 hours. An Ops analyst flags a new phishing attempt. You'd be expected to dig into the logs, identify the pattern, and propose a fix or new rule within two days, most of the time.
Code Quality & Maintainability
The cleanliness, readability, and test coverage of the code you write, as assessed during code reviews.
Target · <5 bugs found in code review per month; 90%+ test coverage for new features. You submit a pull request for a new detection service. If your senior engineer finds only minor stylistic suggestions and the tests pass, you're hitting the mark. If they find critical logic errors, that's a problem.
Proactive Threat Identification
How often you spot new abuse patterns or vulnerabilities before they become a major problem, rather than just reacting to incidents.
- You'll bring new attack vectors to team meetings, propose new detection methods without being asked, or share insights from industry forums. This isn't just about fixing what's broken
- it's about finding what's about to break.
Collaboration with Operations
How effectively you work with the Trust & Safety Operations team to understand their challenges and translate them into engineering solutions.
- Ops team members will tell us you're easy to work with, you listen to their feedback on rule performance, and you explain technical decisions clearly. You're not just throwing code over the fence
- you're building solutions with them.
Documentation Clarity
The quality and completeness of the documentation you create for your rules, services, and investigations.
- Other engineers or Ops team members can easily understand your rule logic, service architecture, and investigation findings without needing to ask you for clarification. Future-you will also thank present-you for this.
Incident Response Participation
Your ability to contribute effectively and calmly during active abuse incidents, helping to diagnose and contain the problem.
- During an incident, you'll be able to quickly pull relevant data, suggest potential fixes, and communicate your findings clearly to the team. You'll be a reliable pair of hands when things get hectic.