The scoreboard, honestly: the hard targets, how often each one is actually looked at,
and the quiet human signals that never make it onto a dashboard.
Project Velocity (Stage-Gate Progression)
How quickly your assigned workstreams or small projects move through our internal Stage-Gate innovation process.
Target · Successfully move 1-2 workstreams/projects per year past a formal Stage-Gate review.Leading a new material development project from 'Concept' to 'Feasibility' gate within 6 months, hitting all technical milestones and presenting a clear go/no-go recommendation.
New Method Development & Validation
The number of new analytical or experimental methods you develop, optimise, and formally validate for use within the R&D team or for tech transfer.
Target · Develop and validate at least 1 new analytical method annually, or significantly improve 2-3 existing ones.Successfully developing a novel HPLC method for impurity detection in a new compound, demonstrating its accuracy, precision, and robustness, and getting it approved for routine use.
Intellectual Property (IP) Contribution
Your direct contribution to the company's IP portfolio through invention disclosures or patent applications.
Target · Contribute to 1-2 invention disclosures or patent filings annually, either as an inventor or a key technical contributor.Identifying a novel application for an existing technology during an experiment, documenting the discovery, and submitting a formal invention disclosure that leads to a patent application.
Experimental Success Rate / Reproducibility
The percentage of your experiments that yield reliable, interpretable, and reproducible results, minimising wasted time and resources on flawed runs.
Target · Maintain an experimental success rate of 85% or higher, with clear root cause analysis for any failures.Over a month, you run 20 complex experiments. 18 yield valid, reproducible data, while 2 fail due to instrument error, which you promptly diagnose and fix. That's a 90% success rate.
Technical Leadership & Problem Solving
How effectively you guide technical discussions, troubleshoot complex experimental issues, and provide clear, data-driven recommendations when things go wrong.
- You're the person others come to when they're stuck on a tricky experiment. You lead post-mortem discussions on failed runs, clearly identifying root causes. Your project lead frequently asks for your technical opinion before making key decisions. You're seen as the go-to expert for specific methodologies or instruments.
Mentorship & Team Development
Your ability to effectively mentor junior scientists and technicians, helping them develop their technical skills, scientific thinking, and problem-solving abilities.
- Junior team members regularly seek your advice. You provide constructive feedback during code reviews or experimental design discussions. Your mentees show clear progress in their independence and skill level over time. You actively share your knowledge, perhaps by running informal training sessions.
Collaboration & Communication Quality
How well you collaborate with other teams (e.g., Engineering, Manufacturing) and articulate complex scientific findings to non-scientific audiences.
- You get invited to early-stage discussions with manufacturing because they trust your input. You can explain a complicated statistical result to a marketing manager in a way they actually understand. You proactively share progress and challenges, avoiding surprises for project leads. People genuinely enjoy working with you.
Documentation & Knowledge Transfer
The clarity, completeness, and timeliness of your experimental documentation and how effectively you contribute to our internal knowledge base.
- Your ELN entries are consistently thorough and easy for others to follow. You contribute to and update our internal standard operating procedures (SOPs) or best practice guides. Colleagues can pick up your work and understand exactly what you did without needing to ask a dozen questions. You help build a culture of good documentation.