The scoreboard, honestly: the hard targets, how often each one is actually looked at,
and the quiet human signals that never make it onto a dashboard.
Complex Case Cycle Time
The average number of business days it takes to close high-risk investigations, like those involving discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.
Target · Under 45 business days (from intake to final resolution/action)You take on a complex harassment claim on 1st March. After interviews, evidence review, and a final decision, it's closed on 10th April. That's 29 business days, well within target.
Case Substantiation Rate (High-Risk)
The percentage of high-risk investigations where the allegations are found to be substantiated, indicating thorough and accurate fact-finding.
Target · Consistent rate, typically 60-75% for substantiated findings (industry benchmark)Out of 10 complex cases this quarter, 7 were substantiated, 2 unsubstantiated, and 1 inconclusive. Your rate is 70%, showing a solid, evidence-based approach.
Business Unit Complaint Reduction
A measurable decrease in formal employee relations complaints (specifically high-risk ones) within the business units you primarily support, showing proactive impact.
Target · 5% reduction year-over-year in high-risk complaints for assigned groupsLast year, your assigned business unit had 20 high-risk complaints. This year, through your proactive advice and training, they've only had 18. That's a 10% reduction.
Legal Review Feedback Score
Feedback from internal or external legal counsel on the quality, thoroughness, and defensibility of your investigation reports and recommendations.
Target · Average score of 4 out of 5 on legal defensibility and clarityAfter submitting a complex investigation report, Legal rates it 4.5/5 for its evidence collection and clear findings, meaning they're confident it'll stand up.
Manager Capability Improvement
Managers you've advised show improved understanding and handling of employee relations issues, leading to fewer repeat problems or escalations.
- Managers proactively seek your advice before issues escalate
- they correctly apply policy in initial stages
- positive feedback from HRBPs on manager growth
- fewer 're-openings' of similar cases with the same manager.
Impartiality & Credibility
You're seen as a fair, unbiased, and trusted resource by employees, managers, and HRBPs, even when delivering difficult news.
- Employees and managers express confidence in your process
- you're consistently sought out for advice
- lack of appeals or challenges to your findings based on perceived bias
- positive feedback in anonymous surveys regarding fairness of process.
Proactive Issue Spotting
Your ability to identify underlying systemic issues or emerging trends from individual cases and suggest preventative actions.
- You present data-driven insights on root causes to leadership
- your recommendations lead to policy changes or targeted training
- you flag potential 'hot spots' before they become major problems
- you're invited to strategic HR discussions.
Stakeholder Communication & Influence
Your ability to clearly communicate complex findings and recommendations to various audiences (employees, managers, legal) and influence them towards the best outcome.
- Investigation summaries are clear and concise
- you can explain legal nuances simply
- managers accept and implement your recommendations without significant pushback
- legal counsel trusts your judgment and defers to your findings in most cases.