The scoreboard, honestly: the hard targets, how often each one is actually looked at,
and the quiet human signals that never make it onto a dashboard.
Search Success Rate
The percentage of users who find what they're looking for on the first attempt using our knowledge platforms.
Target · Increase from 60% to 75% within 12 months.If 100 people search for 'onboarding checklist' and 75 find the correct document without further clicks or rephrasing, that's a 75% success rate. You'll be looking at search logs and user feedback to spot where we're falling short.
Reduction in Repetitive Questions
A decrease in the number of basic, frequently asked questions sent to support teams (e.g., IT helpdesk, HR queries) that should be answerable via the knowledge base.
Target · Achieve a 20% decrease in relevant helpdesk tickets over 6 months.If the IT helpdesk received 100 tickets about 'how to reset my VPN password' last quarter, we'd aim for that to drop to 80 or fewer, meaning people found the answer themselves in the knowledge base you helped build and promote.
Community of Practice (CoP) Engagement
The percentage of active members within the Communities of Practice you lead or support, measured by participation in discussions, events, and content contributions.
Target · Maintain >50% of members active monthly across your assigned CoPs.For a CoP of 50 people, you'd want at least 25 members posting questions, sharing insights, or attending virtual meet-ups each month. You'll be looking at who's talking, who's reading, and who's contributing.
Knowledge Asset Quality Score
An internal rating (e.g., 1-5 stars) based on clarity, accuracy, completeness, and adherence to style guides for knowledge assets you've designed or overseen.
Target · Average score of 4.0 or higher for new and updated assets.After a new process guide is published, a couple of subject matter experts and a peer KM colleague will review it against a checklist. If it's clear, accurate, and easy to follow, it gets a high score. This helps us ensure what we put out there is actually good.
Stakeholder Trust & Consultation
You're seen as a trusted advisor for knowledge transfer, with key stakeholders proactively seeking your input on new projects or process changes.
- You're invited to early-stage project planning meetings, asked to review project proposals for knowledge implications, and senior leaders come to you for advice on how to capture critical expertise. They'll say things like, 'We need to get [Your Name] in on this early.'
Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer Initiatives
The perceived success of the knowledge capture and sharing programmes you lead, as judged by the teams involved.
- Positive feedback from project teams and SMEs during post-implementation reviews. Teams report feeling better equipped after your interventions. People will tell you, 'That debrief really helped us understand what went wrong' or 'The new guide you put together saved us so much time.'
Mentoring Impact
The growth and development of junior team members you mentor, evidenced by their increased autonomy and skill level.
- Junior colleagues you mentor demonstrate improved quality in their work, take on more complex tasks independently, and provide positive feedback about your guidance. Your manager will notice their progress and credit your support.
Process Improvement Adoption
The extent to which new knowledge capture or sharing processes you design are actually adopted and followed by the organisation.
- Teams consistently use the new templates you've created, follow the updated content review workflows, and refer to the governance guidelines you've helped establish. You'll see evidence in audit trails and hear people referencing the 'new way of doing things' that you championed.